Exploring Paths for Reconstruction of Post-Conflict Heritage in Gaza

<p>Focusing on cultural heritage reconstruction pathways in the aftermath of the 2023 armed conflict in Gaza, this thesis aims to explore the feasibility of post-conflict heritage reconstruction, the differences in the needs of different groups, and how reconstruction can contribute to reconciliation and trauma repair.The conflict destroyed 70% of Gaza's built environment, including 110 heritage sites. Drawing on semi-structured interviews with international and local experts, the study proposes a framework for prioritizing reconstruction: predicated on safe clearance (e.g., unexploded ordnance removal); focusing on religious and community spaces as "cultural anchors" for identity and survival; addressing emergency needs with adaptive heritage (e.g., sites converted into temporary shelters); and considering refugee camps as "living heritage" that embodies traces of existence. The study critiques the limitations of international frameworks such as the Hague Convention, including their lack of post-war guidance, weak enforcement, and difficulty adapting to the blockade and governance vacuum in Gaza. It proposes adaptive strategies, including redefining heritage to encompass conflict-derived sites, integrating reconstruction with livelihood restoration, and promoting community-led decision-making.Core challenges include the silencing of marginalized groups, resource shortages, and political interference, which require inclusive participation, phased planning, and flexible standards of authenticity. The study proposes a "Trauma-Memory-Space-Repair" analytical framework, emphasizing that reconstruction is not only a physical restoration but also a sociocultural process, providing theoretical and practical insights for heritage reconstruction in conflict zones.</p>